Striking Out Applications

Timokhin v Timokhina [2023] EWHC 58 (Fam)

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2023/58.html Roberts J. Was a decision to stay a Sch 1 application pending conclusion of proceedings in another jurisdiction a substantive or procedural one? The parties were Russian nationals and parents to two children, aged 11 and 18. The children

AB v CD [2022] EWFC 116

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2022/116.html Roberts J (‘the judge’) dealt with an application to set aside a consent order made in financial remedy proceedings, and a responding application to strike out or summarily dismiss H’s application. The parties were both independently wealthy and

AB v CD [2022] EWFC 116

Judgment date: 29 July 2022 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2022/116.html Roberts J (‘the judge’) dealt with an application to set aside a consent order made in financial remedy proceedings, and a responding application to strike out or summarily dismiss H’s application. The parties

Barrett v Enfield London Borough Council [2001] AC 550

Judgment date: 17 June 1999 https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1999/25.html

N v N [2015] EWHC 514 (Fam)

Judgment date: 22 January 2015 http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2015/514.html

A v B [2018] EWFC 4

Judgment date: 26 January 2018 http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2018/4.html

N v N [2015] EWHC 514 (Fam)

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2015/514.html