FRJ stage

Spousal Maintenance (Quantum)

Li v Simons [2023] EWHC 1626 (Fam)

https://assets.caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/1626/ewhc_fam_2023_1626.pdf Moor J. Judgment on an appeal against an order made in a variation of maintenance application. The parties reached an agreement settling the financial claims arising out of their marriage in April 2020, and a

AB v CD [2022] EWFC 197

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2022/197.html HHJ Shelton. Cross applications to vary a global periodical payment order for a child aged 19 who is severely disabled and a spousal maintenance. The global order at the time of this judgment was £1,250pcm (£1,249 child

Fairness versus Certainty – Should the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 be Amended to Restrict the Duration of Spousal Maintenance?

Fairness versus Certainty – Should the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 be Amended to Restrict the Duration of Spousal Maintenance?

As part of the Law Commission’s review of the law concerning financial division upon divorce, announced on 4 April 2023, it will consider ‘how maintenance payments for an ex-spouse or civil partner should work’. The terms of reference set out that the Law Commission is to consider specifically potential

D v D (Financial Remedy Case) [2020] EWFC B24

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2020/B24.html DJ John Smart. Rare reported modest asset case. Identification of needs in a marriage that, with prior cohab, had lasted only 10 months. Parties aged 51 and 49. Modest assets, almost all brought into the marriage by H, including

DX v JX [2022] EWFC 19

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2022/19.html Moor J. H’s application to vary and/or terminate a spousal periodical payments order, which was agreed by consent in 2017 in England. The spousal periodical payments order was a fixed percentage of H’s income, as opposed

L v L (Financial Remedies: Deferred Clean Break) [2011] EWHC 2207 (Fam)

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2011/2207.html

RC v JC [2020] EWHC 466 (Fam)

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2020/466.html