FRJ stage

Needs

LT v ZU [2022] EWFC 206

https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2022/206 Application by the father challenging an arbitral award concerning provision for the parties’ two children pursuant to Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989. The challenge was on two general grounds: (1) the arbitrator had no power to require the father to

Ditchfield v Ditchfield [2023] EWHC 2303 (Fam)

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2023/2303.html Peel J. Appeal by H of a final financial remedy order where on a clean break basis the assets were divided 62/38 in favour of W. Division was based on H having better future earning potential, H’s

Augousti v Matharu [2023] EWHC 1900 (Fam)

https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/1900 Mostyn J. Decision on permission to appeal on grounds which were considered to be totally without merit and applications for reporting restriction order. H advanced 21 grounds of appeal and made an application to adduce fresh evidence in respect of a

AB v CD [2022] EWFC 198

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2022/198.html HHJ Shelton. Hearing on 14–15 July 2022. Cross-applications to vary global periodical payment order for a child aged 19 who is severely disabled and a spousal maintenance order. Second of three published judgments. Link to previous judgment Link

AB v CD [2023] EWFC 103

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2023/103.html HHJ Shelton. Hearing on 10 February 2023. Cross-applications to vary global periodical payment order for a child aged 19 who is severely disabled and a spousal maintenance order. Third of three published judgments. Link to previous judgments: * AB v

AB v CD [2022] EWFC 197

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2022/197.html HHJ Shelton. Cross applications to vary a global periodical payment order for a child aged 19 who is severely disabled and a spousal maintenance. The global order at the time of this judgment was £1,250pcm (£1,249 child

CC v LC [2023] EWFC 52

https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2023/52 HHJ Wildblood KC. Final hearing in a needs case in which the assets available were limited to a three bedroom property, which housed the W and the three minor children of the marriage. In addition, each party held pensions of a similar