Jurisdiction

Tousi v Gayukova [2023] EWHC 404 (Fam)

https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/404 Mostyn J. Does the court have jurisdiction to transfer a (housing association) tenancy between the parties to an invalid marriage? Do the consequences of invalidity fall to be determined under the law of the country of marriage, or only whether the

Tousi v Gayukova [2023] EWHC 404 (Fam)

Judgment date: 27 February 2023 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/404 Mostyn J. Does the court have jurisdiction to transfer a (housing association) tenancy between the parties to an invalid marriage? Do the consequences of invalidity fall to be determined under the law of the country of

Timokhin v Timokhina [2023] EWHC 58 (Fam)

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2023/58.html Roberts J. Was a decision to stay a Sch 1 application pending conclusion of proceedings in another jurisdiction a substantive or procedural one? The parties were Russian nationals and parents to two children, aged 11 and 18. The children

Timokhin v Timokhina [2023] EWHC 58 (Fam)

Judgment date: 17 January 2023 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2023/58.html Roberts J. Was a decision to stay a Sch 1 application pending conclusion of proceedings in another jurisdiction a substantive or procedural one? The parties were Russian nationals and parents to two children, aged

Nicolaisen v Nicolaisen [2022] EWFC 70

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2022/70.html Moor J. A case involving complex jurisdiction arguments, habitual residence, international marital agreements and underlying assets worth over £200m. Husband (‘H’) was 70 years old and a Norwegian national. The Wife (‘W’) was 50 years old, born in Turkmenistan

Nicolaisen v Nicolaisen [2022] EWFC 70

Judgment date: 01 July 2022 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2022/70.html Moor J. A case involving complex jurisdiction arguments, habitual residence, international marital agreements and underlying assets worth over £200m. Husband (‘H’) was 70 years old and a Norwegian national. The Wife (‘W’) was 50

XO v YO & Anor [2022] EWFC 114

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2022/114.html HHJ Hess. Financial remedies decision concerning whether English court had jurisdiction to determine a claim in respect of immovable property situated outside England where the claim is based on equity; and can adverse inferences be drawn from a party’