FRJ stage

Enforcement

Barclay v Barclay [2023] EWFC 164

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2023/164.html Sir Jonathan Cohen. This was the fifteenth hearing arising out of the W’s three judgment summonses for the payment of £50m, £185k and £60k. The H had been ordered to pay the W £100m in two instalments which

AFW v RFH [2023] EWFC 119

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2023/119.html Recorder Laura Moys. Enforcement of order for sale and PSO. H found to have breached several provisions of FR order. He refused to cooperate in the sale of the FMH, in which H was still living, despite W having

Jardaneh v Jardaneh [2022] EWFC 201

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2022/201.html HHJ Evans-Gordon. Application by W, by way of judgment summons, for the committal of H to prison for failure to make payments ordered under family law orders. The application was issued pursuant to s 5 of the Debtors Act

H v W [2023] EWFC 120

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2023/120.html HHJ Reardon KC. This case concerns cross-applications regarding a final financial remedy order made in May 2021 (the 2021 order) by Recorder Anderson. This included an application by H for a further lump sum to compensate him for losses

X v Y, Re Z (No. 4 Schedule 1 award) [2023] EWFC 25

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2023/25.pdf Mr Justice Cobb. M’s application under Schedule 1 for financial provision from F, who lives in the USA, for Zoe who is 2 years 4 months old and suffers from Williams Syndrome. Zoe also has a congenital heart

Collardeau-Fuchs v Fuchs [2022] EWFC 45

https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2022/45 Mostyn J. W’s application for enforcement of interim maintenance order (maintenance decision summarised here). H had negligently failed to pay wages of staff at the parties’ house in Antibes, such payments being part of the interim order. While court did not

Brake & Anor v Guy & Ors [2022] EWHC 1746 (Ch)

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2022/1746.html HHJ Paul Matthews. Application for a third party debt order (TPDO; formerly a garnishee order) against the trustees of Mr Brake’s SIPP. The debt was in relation to the costs of litigation lost by Mr Brake. Brake had