FRJ stage

Children Act 1989 Schedule 1 Applications

G v W [2022] EWHC 1101 (Fam)

https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2022/1101 Sir Jonathan Cohen. An appeal in Schedule 1 proceedings following Re A (Schedule 1, Overspend, Costs Clawback) ⁠[2022] EWFC 21. Permission was granted to M to appeal the decision to dismiss her claim for additional payments for a nanny, and additional

J & K v L [2021] EWFC B104

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/Misc/2021/B104.html HHJ Hess. M’s application for financial provision for children now aged 20 and 18 under Schedule 1. Discussion of the ‘extension conditions’, i.e. when there is an obligation to provide financial support to children once they attain majority,

A v V [2022] EWHC 3501 (Fam)

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2022/3501.html Mr Justice Francis. A ‘relatively straightforward’ application pursuant to Schedule 1. F’s costs were c.£3.8m and M’s were £1.7m, despite F attending the final hearing as a litigant in person. F ran the millionaire’

Re A (Schedule 1, Overspend, Costs Clawback) [2022] EWFC 21

Editor's note: this judgment has been removed from Bailii, possibly because of concerns about jigsaw identification. Recorder Chandler QC. Schedule 1 proceedings in which M sought that F clear all her liabilities and provide additional periodical payments above the agreed £8,000 pcm for the costs of a

Her Royal Highness Haya Bint Al Hussein v His Highness Mohammed Bin Rashid Al Maktoum [2021] EWFC 94

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2021/94.html Moor J. High profile applications by W under Schedule 1, Part III MFPA and the Married Women’s Property Act 1882 concluded with a record-breaking award. Lump sum awarded to W of £251.5m including capitalised security costs (for

UD v DN (Schedule 1, Children Act 1989; Capital Provision) [2021] EWCA Civ 1947

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2021/1947.html Moylan LJ (judgment), King LJ and Newey LJ. The Court of Appeal allowed a father’s appeal against a settlement of property order in favour of the parties’ two younger children (17 and 12 at the date of the

UD v DN [2021] EWCA Civ 1947

https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/UD-v-DN-judgment.pdf