Order 1.3: Consent Order under the Accelerated First Appointment Procedure Order 1.3 - Consent Order under Accelerated FA procedureorder-1.3-consent-order-under-accelerated-fa-procedure.docx52 KBdownload-circle
Are You There ChatGPT? It’s Me, Charlotte – ChatGPT, Generative AI and the Law Readers will probably have heard by now of OpenAI’s ChatGPT. Many of you will have experimented with it, or one of the other available generative artificial intelligence (AI) models such as Microsoft’s Bing. If you have not yet utilised any of these new technologies, you will very likely
Watch | Re-marriage: avoiding the elephant trap https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/8916841461901/WN_nVXEifzBSCigqvaoLy_s1Q Watch the recording of '?Re-marriage: avoiding the elephant trap' first broadcast on Friday 16th June 2023, with speakers: ?Cordelia Williams, Barrister at Pump Court Chambers and Claire Howard, Associate Solicitor at Raydens. In this webinar, Cordelia and Claire
How Private FDRs Can Be Improved "Perhaps the only certainty about an FDR indication is that the outcome at final hearing is almost bound to be different” As family lawyers, we are good at some things; less so at others. Our strong suit is thinking creatively and holistically in finding a solution to any given
Child Maintenance Top-Ups – an Update Following James v Seymour [2023] EWHC 844 (Fam) http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2023/844.html Introduction The quantum of child maintenance is an area of considerable contention, particularly in the context that there are now around 629,000 taxpayers earning more than £150,000. This is a 2.3 times increase since the statutory
James v Seymour [2023] EWHC 844 (Fam) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/844 Mostyn J. An appeal concerning the correct approach to the calculation of child maintenance liability in which Mostyn J adds to the ever-expanding repository of family law acronyms. The mother ('M') and father ('F') had married in
Do Not Sign It Unless You Intend to Be Bound By Its Terms This is often the wording we see on the front of all well drafted pre-nuptial agreements. So why do clients sign them if they intend to try wriggle out of them at the time of a divorce? In the case of MN v AN [2023] EWHC 613 (Fam) **the wife