DOWNLOAD ISSUE 3 - November 2022 (PDF)
Financial Remedies Journal Issue 3 Digitalfinancial-remedies-journal-issue-3-digital.pdf27 MBdownload-circle
Latest
Cryptoassets – Disarray and Definition
This has been another interesting week in the world of crypto. The markets are currently in disarray following the exchange FTX filing for bankruptcy as its connected token (FTT) dropped from USD$22 to USD$2 over just two days. Investors are no doubt extremely concerned as to whether they
Cryptoassets – Disarray and Definition
This has been another interesting week in the world of crypto. The markets are currently in disarray following the exchange FTX filing for bankruptcy as its connected token (FTT) dropped from USD$22 to USD$2 over just two days. Investors are no doubt extremely concerned as to whether they
HA v WA v BV [2022] EWFC 110
Judgment date: 27 September 2022
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2022/110
Sir Jonathan Cohen. Issue between the parties in relation to beneficial ownership of a property held in the W’s sole name. H’s case was that the property belonged legally and beneficially to the W, where
XO v YO & Anor [2022] EWFC 114
Judgment date: 22 September 2022
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2022/114.html
HHJ Hess. Financial remedies decision concerning whether English court had jurisdiction to determine a claim in respect of immovable property situated outside England where the claim is based on equity; and can adverse inferences
HA v WA v BV [2022] EWFC 110
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2022/110
Sir Jonathan Cohen. Issue between the parties in relation to beneficial ownership of a property held in the W’s sole name. H’s case was that the property belonged legally and beneficially to the W, where the W’s case was
XO v YO & Anor [2022] EWFC 114
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2022/114.html
HHJ Hess. Financial remedies decision concerning whether English court had jurisdiction to determine a claim in respect of immovable property situated outside England where the claim is based on equity; and can adverse inferences be drawn from a party’