FRJ stage

Latest

Watch | For reasons which are not fanciful: is Daniels v Walker fit for purpose?

Watch | For reasons which are not fanciful: is Daniels v Walker fit for purpose?

Watch the recording of 'For reasons which are not fanciful: is Daniels v Walker fit for purpose?', first broadcast on Wednesday 23rd November 2022, with chair: Nicholas Allen KC, 29 Bedford Row and panellists: HHJ McCabe, Circuit Judge; Samantha Hillas KC, St John's Buildings and Andrew

AB v CD [2022] EWFC 116

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2022/116.html Roberts J (‘the judge’) dealt with an application to set aside a consent order made in financial remedy proceedings, and a responding application to strike out or summarily dismiss H’s application. The parties were both independently wealthy and

Watch | Cryptoassets in Financial Remedies: an introduction for the uninitiated

Watch | Cryptoassets in Financial Remedies: an introduction for the uninitiated

Watch the recording of ‘Cryptoassets in Financial Remedies: an introduction for the uninitiated’, first broadcast on Friday 11th November 2022, with chair: Joseph Rainer, QEB and panelists: Helen Brander, Pump Court Chambers; Ben Fearnley, 29 Bedford Row and Marc Samuels, The 36 Group. Joseph Rainer, QEB Joe is a junior

The Digital Portal in the London FRC 27-10-22

The Digital Portal in the London FRC 27-10-22 (1)the-digital-portal-in-the-london-frc-27-10-22-1.pdf111 KBdownload-circle

Quashie v Solomon [2022] UKPC 34

https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2022/34.html The Privy Council heard an appeal concerning promissory and proprietary estoppel and the time for enforcing interests held under constructive trusts. Mr and Mrs Solomon married in 1978 and divorced in 1981. They had one child, Ayana, the respondent to

Ralph v Given [2022] EWHC 2395 (KB)

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/KB/2022/2395.html Freedman J. Claimant’s application for summary judgment in relation to application to deliver up an Aston Martin DBX and a Range Rover Sport or damages for conversion. C argued these were gifts. The claimant (C) and defendant (D)

SA v FA [2022] EWFC 115

https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2022/115 HHJ Hess. Judgment concerning divorce proceedings, domicile and the most appropriate forum. The parties met and married in England; the W was originally from South Africa. They had moved to the UAE in 2008 and remained there due to the H’s