West Midlands FR Zone Local Practice Direction
West Mids local practice direction for distributionwest-mids-local-practice-direction-for-distribution.pdf273 KBdownload-circle
Latest
What Is a ‘Predicament of Real Need’?
In Radmacher (Formerly Granatino) v Granatino [2010] 2 FLR 1900 at [81] Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers said that of the three strands identified in White v White [2000] 2 FLR 981 and Miller/McFarlane [2006] 1 FLR 1186 it was needs and compensation which could most readily render it
What Is a ‘Predicament of Real Need’?
In Radmacher (Formerly Granatino) v Granatino [2010] 2 FLR 1900 at [81] Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers said that of the three strands identified in White v White [2000] 2 FLR 981 and Miller/McFarlane [2006] 1 FLR 1186 it was needs and compensation which could most readily render it
Notionally Flawed? Notional Assessments in LSPO Applications
The past weeks have brought two more High Court judgments considering the practice of deducting a percentage from an LSPO applicant’s costs provision by way of a ‘notional standard assessment’. The first, JK v LM [2024] EWHC 1442 (Fam), was a judgment of Cobb J doubling down on the
Notionally Flawed? Notional Assessments in LSPO Applications
The past weeks have brought two more High Court judgments considering the practice of deducting a percentage from an LSPO applicant’s costs provision by way of a ‘notional standard assessment’. The first, JK v LM [2024] EWHC 1442 (Fam), was a judgment of Cobb J doubling down on the
AT v BT [2023] EWHC 3531 (Fam)
Judgment date: 06 November 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/3531
Francis J. A final hearing in H’s financial remedy application.
W sought a lump sum of £9.145m on the basis of sharing and compensation. H asserted this was a needs case due to the
AT v BT [2023] EWHC 3531 (Fam)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/3531
Francis J. A final hearing in H’s financial remedy application.
W sought a lump sum of £9.145m on the basis of sharing and compensation. H asserted this was a needs case due to the non-matrimonial nature of the assets