DB v PB [2016] EWHC 3431 (Fam)

https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2024/212 HHJ Hess. High-profile Schedule 1 Final Hearing between Lauryn Goodman and Kyle Walker in which the judge made transparency orders in accordance with the guidance set out in the Transparency Reporting Pilot for Financial Remedy Proceedings. The parties are Ms Lauryn

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2024/328.html DJ Phillips. Final hearing where the issues concerned whether a post-nuptial agreement was binding on the parties and fair. The parties were married for 9 years and had one child, 10, and, W’s older child, 19, who was

https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/241 Cusworth J. A preliminary issue hearing where the substantive question was how the chattels fell to be characterised for the purposes of the prenuptial agreement (PNA), and consequently the respective entitlements of the parties in those items following their divorce. Facts W