CP v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (CSM) [2015] UKUT 391 (AAC)
Related
The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v LR & Anor [2025] EWFC 271 (B)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/271?query=2025+ewfc+271+%28B%29
A Mother v A Father (Re Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989) [2024] EWFC 63
Judgment date: 19 February 2024
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2024/63.html
HHJ Vincent. Schedule 1 matter determined in light of the child’s needs and the strict remit of Schedule 1, notwithstanding the significant disparity between the parents’ respective economic positions and standards of living.
A Mother v A Father (Re Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989) [2024] EWFC 63
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2024/63.html
HHJ Vincent. Schedule 1 matter determined in light of the child’s needs and the strict remit of Schedule 1, notwithstanding the significant disparity between the parents’ respective economic positions and standards of living.
Background
The applicant M and
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring
Related
The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v LR & Anor [2025] EWFC 271 (B)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/271?query=2025+ewfc+271+%28B%29
A Mother v A Father (Re Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989) [2024] EWFC 63
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2024/63.html
HHJ Vincent. Schedule 1 matter determined in light of the child’s needs and the strict remit of Schedule 1, notwithstanding the significant disparity between the parents’ respective economic positions and standards of living.
Background
The applicant M and
A Mother v A Father (Re Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989) [2024] EWFC 63
Judgment date: 19 February 2024
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2024/63.html
HHJ Vincent. Schedule 1 matter determined in light of the child’s needs and the strict remit of Schedule 1, notwithstanding the significant disparity between the parents’ respective economic positions and standards of living.
Latest
Free Webinar | The 2026 FRC Guide: What Practitioners Need to Know
Join the authors of the new FRC Guide - HHJ Edward Hess, Nicholas Allen KC, Michael Allum, Lily Mottahedan and Rhys Taylor - as they discuss its origins, drafting and intentions - and its likely impact on financial remedy cases at all levels in the months and years ahead.
Mazur in the Court of Appeal: the Judgment That Saved Half the Profession from Accidental Criminality
The Court of Appeal rewrites the landscape of ‘conduct of litigation’ – Mazur & Stuart v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP & Ors [2026] EWCA Civ 369.
Portals: Bringing It All Together
Tips and tricks on using the digital court portals from a member of the stakeholder group for the profession, including how to avoid the double login, when to denote documents as confidential, and how to prompt a response from the court.