FRJ stage

Christie Elizabeth O’Connell

Christie Elizabeth O’Connell

Barrister at 1 Hare Court.

read more

AZ v BZ (Financial Remedies Appeal) [2020] EWFC B86

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2020/B86.html HHJ Vincent. Appeal by H of a financial remedy order where on a clean break basis the assets were divided 99/1 in favour of W. The asset pool was modest, mostly made up of equity in a Spanish

Backstrom v Wennberg [2023] EWFC 79

https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2023/79 Mr L. Samuels KC, sitting as a deputy High Court judge. The court heard cross applications for financial remedies orders. W issued a notice that H show cause why he should not be held to their pre- and post-marital agreements. H failed

Timokhin v Timokhina [2023] EWHC 58 (Fam)

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2023/58.html Roberts J. Was a decision to stay a Sch 1 application pending conclusion of proceedings in another jurisdiction a substantive or procedural one? The parties were Russian nationals and parents to two children, aged 11 and 18. The children

ARQ v YAQ [2022] EWFC 128

https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2022/128 Moor J. H was a highly successful retired businessman. He married W in 2005 in what was an entirely conventional second marriage. Alongside a significant portfolio of assets, H owned a sheep and cattle farm in Country C, named 'BT'

XO v YO & Anor [2022] EWFC 114

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2022/114.html HHJ Hess. Financial remedies decision concerning whether English court had jurisdiction to determine a claim in respect of immovable property situated outside England where the claim is based on equity; and can adverse inferences be drawn from a party’

Pierburg v Pierburg [2022] EWHC 2701 (Fam)

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2022/2701.html Facts Moor J (‘the judge’) dealt with an application made by Clarissa Gisela Pierburg (‘W’) for financial provision after an overseas divorce pursuant to Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984. The respondent was Jurgen Pierburg

Christie Elizabeth O’Connell

Barrister at 1 Hare Court.